The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HANS-HEINRICH MULLER,
APPELLANT
____________
Appeal 2007-3992
Application 10/347,8671
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: October 9, 2007
____________
Before ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON, CAROL A. SPIEGEL, and
MARK NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judges.
NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1 Application filed 22 January 2003, claiming the benefit under 35 U.S.C.
§ 119(a) of German Application 102 02 847.8, filed 24 January 2002. The
real party in interest is listed as Hauni Maschinenbau AG. (Supplemental
Appeal Brief under 37 C.F.R. § 41.37 filed 5 September 2006 ("Br.") at 3.)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013