Appeal 2007-1992
Application 09/318,447
16. The method of claim 11 including sending from the server system
to the client system a confirmation that the order was generated.
17. The method of claim 11 wherein the single action is clicking a
mouse button when a cursor is positioned over a predefined area of
the displayed information.
18. The method of claim 11 wherein the single action is a sound
generated by a user.
19. The method of claim 11 wherein the single action is selection
using a television remote control.
20. The method of claim 11 wherein the single action is depressing of
a key on a key pad.
21. The method of claim 11 wherein the single action is selecting
using a pointing device.
22. The method of claim 11 wherein the single action is selection of a
displayed indication.
23. The method of claim 11 wherein the displaying includes
displaying partial information supplied by the server system as to the
identity of a user of the client system.
24. The method of claim 11 wherein the displaying includes
displaying partial shipping information supplied by the server system.
25. The method of claim 11 wherein the displaying includes
displaying partial payment information supplied by the server system.
26. The method of claim 11 wherein the displaying includes
displaying a moniker identifying a shipping address for the customer.
3. The Examiner did not make a limitation-by-limitation comparison of a
claim on appeal and a Hartman patent claim. Taking claim 108 on appeal as
10
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013