The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte WILLEM VAN DAM, MICHAEL T. MENASCO, JAMES J. HARRISON, and MARK R. LOGAN ______________ Appeal 2007-4193 Application 10/367,432 Technology Center 1700 _______________ Decided: September 25, 2007 _______________ Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHARLES F. WARREN, and CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Applicants appeal to the Board from the decision of the Primary Examiner refusing to allow claims 1 through 11 as amended subsequent to the Office Action mailed October 26, 2005. 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134(a) (2002); 37 C.F.R. § 41.31(a) (2006). We affirm the decision of the Primary Examiner.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013