The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________________
Ex parte GORDON K. GOLDMAN
____________________
Appeal 2007-4234
Application 10/929,8911
Technology Center 1700
____________________
Decided: 26 September 2007
____________________
Before TEDDY S. GRON, CAROL A. SPIEGEL, and MARK NAGUMO,
Administrative Patent Judges.
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
I. Introduction
Gordon K. Goldman ("Appellant") appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the final rejections of claims 1-19 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first
1 Application filed 30 August 2004 and said to be a continuation of
application 09/994,390, filed 26 November 2001, now U.S. Patent 6,783,582
B2, issued 31 August 2004, said to be a continuation-in-part of application
09/317,669, filed 24 May 1999, now U.S. Patent 6,322,621 B1, issued 27
November 2001. The real parties-in-interest are said to be the applicant and
his assignee, Nuritchem, L.L.C. (Appeal Brief filed 3 October 2006 ("Br.")
at 2).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013