- 80 - with the least damage to the parts occurring during the process. See Webb Export Corp. v. Commissioner, 91 T.C. at 143. The record in these cases shows that it took significant periods of training and experience for operators to learn the standardized techniques utilized by B&L Ireland and by B&L Hong Kong to as- semble sunglasses ready for sale to the ultimate consumers. Even Dr. Cohen admitted that certain problems encountered by B&L Ireland and by B&L Hong Kong might have been attributable to the fact that they were mass producing sunglasses, rather than assem- bling prescription eyeglasses for a retail optical shop. In addition, the sunglasses assembled at both B&L Ireland and B&L Hong Kong were inspected at least once by someone other than the operator who assembled them to ensure that the sunglas- ses complied with B&L's quality standards. Dr. Cohen testified that, at least in Ohio, an optician was required to examine prescription eyeglasses before they were distributed to the ultimate consumer. Although the position of an inspector at B&L Ireland and at B&L Hong Kong was not the equivalent of an optician who is licensed and trained to dispense prescription eyeglasses, the record in these cases establishes that inspectors at B&L Ireland and at B&L Hong Kong required significant periods of training and experience in order to perform their jobs proper- ly. The need for trained inspectors to ensure that the sun- glasses assembled by B&L Ireland and by B&L Hong Kong met B&L'sPage: Previous 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011