- 11 - having subsequently received the tentative refund of the investment credit carryback of $4,546 to the year 1980. In the notice of deficiency, respondent disallowed the losses and credits claimed by petitioners on their 1983 and 1984 returns, determining that Series 162 was not an activity engaged in for profit and was devoid of economic substance. In general, a transaction is effective for income tax purposes only if its economic substance is consonant with its intended tax effects. Frank Lyon Co. v. United States, 435 U.S. 561, 573 (1978); Knetsch v. United States, 364 U.S. 361, 365-366 (1960); Goldstein v. Commissioner, 364 F.2d 734 (2d Cir. 1966), affg. 44 T.C. 284 (1965). In evaluating whether a transaction possesses economic substance, the Court looks to objective factors that indicate whether the taxpayer acquired an equity interest in the property, and whether the taxpayer had a realistic potential for profit. Levy v. Commissioner, 91 T.C. 838, 856 (1988); Cherin v. Commissioner, 89 T.C. 986, 993 (1987); Packard v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 397, 417 (1985). The Court applied these objective factors in Barrister Equipment Associates Series #115 v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1994-205, the test case in this Court for the litigation project involving the Barrister partnerships. In that case, this Court held that the transactions involving Barrister partnerships Series 115 (Series 115) lacked economic substance and were shams.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011