James L. and Patricia A. Connell - Page 12

                                       - 12 -                                         

               Respondent determined the deficiencies against petitioners             
          on the premise that the facts and transactions involved in this             
          case are essentially the same as those in Barrister Equipment               
          Associates Series #115 v. Commissioner, supra.  Although                    
          petitioner's investment in Series 162 was not exactly the same as           
          the investments in Series 115, petitioner acknowledged, at trial,           
          that the facts surrounding, and the transactions involving,                 
          Series 115 and Series 162 were basically the same, and that,                
          essentially, the partnerships were all "cookie-cutter".                     
          Petitioners presented no evidence to show that petitioner's                 
          investment in this case differed in a material manner from those            
          in Series 115.  Accordingly, the Court finds that the holding in            
          Barrister Equipment Associates Series #115 v. Commissioner,                 
          supra, is controlling and, therefore, is applicable to this case.           
          See Simmons v. Union News Co., 341 F.2d 531, 533 (6th Cir. 1965);           
          see also Leishman v. Radio Condenser Co., 167 F.2d 890 (9th Cir.            
          1948).  The Court, therefore, finds that the transactions                   
          involving Series 162 lacked economic substance.  Accordingly,               
          respondent is sustained as to the deficiencies in tax.                      
               Respondent determined that petitioners are liable for                  
          additions to tax for negligence for the taxable years in issue.             
          Section 6653(a) for 1980 and section 6653(a)(1) for 1983 and 1984           
          impose an addition to tax if any portion of an underpayment is              
          due to negligence or intentional disregard of rules or                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011