James L. and Patricia A. Connell - Page 16

                                       - 16 -                                         

          investigations of the merits of the investment programs he                  
          promoted with persons knowledgeable about the book publishing               
          business.  Petitioner's role as promoter, coupled with his                  
          initial skepticism, placed him in the situation where he should             
          have done more than merely rely on discussions with individuals             
          who had no knowledge of the nontax aspects of the investment.  On           
          this record, the Court holds that petitioners are liable for the            
          additions to tax for negligence for the years at issue.                     
          Respondent is sustained on this issue.                                      
               Respondent determined that petitioners are liable for the              
          additions to tax for valuation overstatements under section                 
          6659(a) on the underpayments of their Federal income taxes for              
          the years at issue attributable to the investment tax credits               
          claimed with respect to Series 162.                                         
               A graduated addition to tax is imposed when an individual              
          has an underpayment of tax that equals or exceeds $1,000 and is             
          attributable to a valuation overstatement.  Sec. 6659(a), (d).  A           
          valuation overstatement exists if the fair market value (or                 
          adjusted basis) of property claimed on a return equals or exceeds           
          150 percent of the amount determined to be the correct amount.              
          Sec. 6659(c).  If the claimed valuation exceeds 250 percent of              
          the correct value, the addition is equal to 30 percent of the               
          underpayment.  Sec. 6659(b).  In this case, respondent determined           
          that the overstatement percentage in petitioner's investment in             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011