James L. and Patricia A. Connell - Page 17

                                       - 17 -                                         

          Series 162 was over 1,000 percent and accordingly applied the 30-           
          percent rate.                                                               
               As stated above, petitioners bear the burden of proving that           
          respondent's determination on this issue in the notice of                   
          deficiency is erroneous.  Rule 142(a); Bixby v. Commissioner, 58            
          T.C. 757, 791 (1972).  Petitioners failed to present any evidence           
          to show that respondent's determination under section 6659(a) was           
          erroneous.  Accordingly, respondent is sustained on this issue.             
               Section 6661(a) imposes an addition to tax equal to 25                 
          percent of the amount attributable to a substantial                         
          understatement of income tax.  An understatement is substantial             
          if it exceeds the greater of 10 percent of the tax required to be           
          shown on the return or $5,000.  Sec. 6661(b)(1)(A).8                        
               Petitioners failed to present any evidence to prove that               
          they should not be held liable for the additions to tax under               
          section 6661(a).  Rule 142(a); Bixby v. Commissioner, supra.                
          Accordingly, respondent is sustained on this issue.                         
               With respect to the increased rate of interest determined by           
          respondent, section 6621(c) provides for an increased rate of               
          interest with respect to any underpayment in excess of $1,000               
          that is "attributable to one or more tax motivated transactions".           

          8                                                                           
               An understatement will be reduced to the extent that it is:            
          (1) Based on substantial authority, or (2) adequately disclosed             
          in the return or in a statement attached to the return.  Sec.               
          6661(b)(2)(B).  Petitioners have failed to prove that either of             
          these situations existed in this case.                                      




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011