- 12 -
reflected the following conclusions of Mr. Wharton about the lost
revenue, the direct costs, the variable overhead costs, and the
lost profits of both DCI and ETS:
Additional revenues
Service . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,957,613
Mileage . . . . . . . . . . . . 169,420
Office . . . . . . . . . . . . 553,745
Photo, phone, and
reimbursable items . . . . . 309,574 $2,990,352
Less: Direct costs
Service . . . . . . . . . . . . 738,420
Mileage . . . . . . . . . . . . 145,212
Office . . . . . . . . . . . . 174,939
Photo, phone, and
reimbursable items . . . . . 281,430 1,340,001
Less: Variable overhead costs . 155,132
Additional profits . . . . . . . 1,495,219
Mr. Wharton explained at the damages hearing the approach
that he used in preparing Analysis 1 and in arriving at the
conclusions set forth therein, as follows:
(1) Mr. Wharton first determined that DCI and ETS lost the
following amounts of additional revenue during the years indi-
cated:
Year Amount
1981 $56,993
1982 488,522
1983 865,182
1984 983,918
1985 595,737
Total lost revenues 2,990,352
Mr. Wharton made the foregoing determinations by examining
certain invoices that private investigative agencies other than
DCI had submitted to FIG during the period 1981 through 1985 for
work that he determined should have been assigned to DCI under
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011