- 13 - the agreement at issue in the Farmers lawsuit and by examining certain other records that were obtained from FIG containing the charges for such work. (2) Mr. Wharton next analyzed certain historical financial data of DCI and ETS that showed the categories, and the amounts in each category, of revenues received by DCI and by ETS during the years 1981 through 1984. Based on that analysis, Mr. Wharton concluded there were the following four categories of revenues received by DCI or ETS during those years, (a) service, (b) mile- age, (c) office, and (d) photo, phone, and reimbursable items. He allocated the total lost revenues of $2,990,352 among those four categories in proportions that reflected the historical data relating to those years that he had analyzed. (3) Mr. Wharton next analyzed certain historical financial data of DCI and ETS that indicated the relationship of costs to revenues within each of the four categories of revenues shown in Analysis 1. Based on that analysis, Mr. Wharton determined the direct costs that DCI or ETS would have incurred in generating the lost revenues within each of those categories. (4) Mr. Wharton next conducted "a study of the general administrative-type expenses" to determine the additional vari- able overhead costs (variable overhead) that DCI or ETS would have incurred on an annual basis during 1981 through 1985 in generating the $2,990,352 of total lost revenues for that period. (5) Mr. Wharton next reduced the total lost revenues by thePage: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011