Lumber City Corporation, f.k.a. Neiman-Reed Lumber and Supply Company, Inc. - Page 39

                                       - 39 -                                         

          Appeals concerns the character and condition of the company.  The           
          relevant factors include the company's size as shown by its                 
          sales, net income or capital value, and the complexities of the             
          business and general economic conditions.  Elliotts, Inc. v.                
          Commissioner, supra at 1246.                                                
               Petitioner has demonstrated that prior to and during the               
          years at issue it was engaged in a very competitive and complex             
          business.  Prior to Mr. Ruf's arrival, petitioner was on the                
          verge of bankruptcy and was facing increased competition from the           
          entry of large discount home centers into its market.  Although             
          petitioner was on the verge of bankruptcy prior to Mr. Ruf's                
          becoming its CEO and, according to its financial statement, had             
          net income after taxes (but before utilization of net operating             
          loss carryforwards/carrybacks) for its fiscal year ended February           
          28, 1986, of negative $3,599,000, its financial statements show             
          that it had a net profit after taxes (but before utilization of             
          net operating loss carryforwards/carrybacks) for its fiscal years           
          ended February 28, 1987, February 29, 1988, February 28, 1989,              
          February 28, 1990, and February 28, 1991, of $823,000, $413,000,            
          $390,000, $325,000, and $275,000, respectively.  Under Mr. Ruf's            
          direction, petitioner made a significant turnaround and returned            
          to profitability.                                                           
               Although petitioner's financial statements show that it had            
          a positive net profit after taxes (but before utilization of net            





Page:  Previous  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011