Estate of Philip Meriano, Deceased, Anita Panepinto, Administratrix - Page 54

                                       - 54 -                                         
          and also showed a payment allegedly made the night before; i.e.,            
          on December 6, 1994, in the amount of $188,000.15                           
               Respondent called as a witness Howard Switkay (Switkay), who           
          is employed as an Appeals officer by the Internal Revenue                   
          Service.  He was assigned as an Appeals officer to handle the               
          disposition of this case.  He was called as a witness for the               
          sole purpose of identifying Exhibit T, which respondent                     
          introduced into evidence.                                                   
               Exhibit T is a computerized printout of a bill for legal               
          services performed by the Tupitza law firm for Panepinto as                 
          executrix of the Meriano Estate, covering the period from June 6,           
          1993, through November 8, 1993, and is dated November 8, 1993.              
          It was submitted to Switkay by Tupitza during settlement                    
          negotiations, and it was understood between Switkay and Tupitza             
          that it was documentation in support of charges for legal                   
          services that Tupitza was seeking to deduct on the estate tax               
          return.  Legal services performed by Tupitza for the estate were            
          charged at the rate of $150 per hour on Exhibit T.  After Switkay           
          testified about Exhibit T, Tupitza put himself back on the stand            
          and was questioned on redirect examination by Scott:                        
                    Q  Mr. Tupitza, does the bill just entered into                   
               evidence by the Internal Revenue Service accurately                    
               reflect the charges which were submitted to the client?                

          15        No documentary evidence of the alleged $188,000 payment           
          was introduced into evidence apart from the $188,000 credited to            
          the account on Exh. 47.                                                     





Page:  Previous  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011