- 57 - The Court then invited either party to examine Scott and Tupitza inquired of him: TUPITZA Are you in fact paid by the law firm of Tupitza and Marinelli? (SCOTT) Yes, I am. TUPITZA And do you in fact expect to get a 1099 for all that you're paid from the firm? (SCOTT) Yes, I do. In fact, if I didn't get a 1099 I would complain to you.[17] The following is a summary of Exhibit 47: Hours Charges Scott 760.70 $115,535.00 Tupitza 302.10 67,437.50 $182,972.50 Ericsson (Attorney) 16.20 2,025.00 Paralegal 25.00 1,500.00 3,525.00 Projected Trial Time: Scott 10:00 1,500.00 Tupitza 10:00 2,250.00 3,750.00 Additional charges 2,756.93 $193,004.43 17 When Scott was questioning Tupitza on direct examination, Scott asked: "What year did you first pay fees to Mr. Scott? And Tupitza answered: "I think the first fees I actually paid to Mr. Scott or remitted to Mr. Scott were probably in 1994." We note that from the first billing date on Exhibit 17-Q, August 20, 1990, (Scott billed $2,187.50 for 12-1/2 hours to "Organize file for Tax Court") until December 6, 1994, when the estate, during trial, allegedly paid the Tupitza law firm $188,000, the estate had only paid the law firm a total of $8,100.Page: Previous 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011