Northwestern Indiana Telephone Company - Page 76

                                               - 76 -                                                  
            and 1989.  It is well established that a payment made to a                                 
            shareholder's family member can constitute a section 301                                   
            distribution by a corporation with respect to the stock of the                             
            shareholder.  Green v. United States, 460 F.2d 412, 419 (5th Cir.                          
            1972); Epstein v. Commissioner, 53 T.C. 459, 474-475 (1969).                               
            Under proper circumstances, it is appropriate to hold that a                               
            corporate payment made to or on behalf of a shareholder's family                           
            member represents a distribution by the corporation to the                                 
            shareholder, because the shareholder enjoys the use of the                                 
            property as much as if the corporation had distributed the                                 
            property directly to the shareholder.  Epstein v. Commissioner,                            
            supra.  In determining whether an expenditure by a corporation                             
            represents income to the shareholder, it is necessary to decide                            
            whether the expenditure primarily benefited the shareholder                                
            personally rather than furthered the interest of the corporation.                          
            Hagaman v. Commissioner, 958 F.2d 684, 690-691 (6th Cir. 1992),                            
            affg. on this issue T.C. Memo. 1987-549; Ireland v. United                                 
            States, 621 F.2d 731, 735 (5th Cir. 1980).                                                 

            Legal Expenses for which Respondent Disallowed Business                                    
            Deductions to NITCO                                                                        

                  In the notice of deficiency issued to the Mussmans,                                  
            respondent determined that the legal expenses for which                                    
            respondent disallowed business deductions to NITCO for 1988 and                            
            1989 represented constructive dividend income to Mr. Mussman.                              
            Respondent further determined that these legal expenses were                               



Page:  Previous  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011