Northwestern Indiana Telephone Company - Page 71

                                               - 71 -                                                  
            cable television company NICATV.  Respondent also asserts that                             
            petitioners have failed to establish that the disputed legal                               
            expenses were directly connected with or proximately resulted                              
            from NITCO's business activities.  We essentially agree with                               
            respondent.                                                                                
                  We think that the mere naming of NITCO as a party in the FCC                         
            proceedings does not suffice to make the legal expenses                                    
            deductible.  The Synanon Church v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1989-                          
            270.16  In Gilmore, the Supreme Court noted:                                               



            16But cf. Kopp's Co. v. United States, 636 F.2d 59, 61 (4th                                
            Cir. 1980), where the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit                              
            distinguished United States v. Gilmore, 372 U.S. 39 (1963),                                
            reversed the lower court's holding that the legal expense in                               
            dispute failed to meet the origin-of-the-claim test, and allowed                           
            the taxpayer-corporation to deduct certain legal expense.  In                              
            Kopp's Co., the corporation incurred the legal expense in                                  
            defending itself and a shareholder's son in a tort suit stemming                           
            from an accident involving a company car driven by the son.  The                           
            son had not been a corporate employee, nor had he been engaged in                          
            performing corporate business.  The court distinguished Gilmore                            
            on the basis that the taxpayer-corporation had been named as a                             
            party defendant and was alleged to have negligently permitted the                          
            son to operate its car.  We think that Kopp's Co. v. United                                
            States is inapposite to the instant cases.  Unlike the instant                             
            cases, the taxpayer-corporation in Kopp's Co. apparently engaged                           
            only in business activities.  The activity giving rise to the                              
            lawsuit, although arguably unrelated to the taxpayer’s business,                           
            was an isolated incident.  In contrast, NITCO engaged in                                   
            substantial nonbusiness activities before, during, and after the                           
            years in issue.  Indeed, the precise activities giving rise to                             
            the proceedings in issue were NITCO’s nonbusiness activities.                              
            For example, the FCC based its conclusion that NITCO and NICATV                            
            were affiliated, inter alia, upon the following nonbusiness                                
            activities:  (1) NITCO’s construction and maintenance of signal                            
            distribution facilities for NICATV, (2) Rhys’ responsibility,                              
            while serving as NITCO’s executive vice president, for                                     
            negotiating pole attachment agreements with competing cable                                
            companies, (3) the fact that all contractual agreements between                            
            NITCO and NICATV were oral, and (4) Rhys’ oral “consulting                                 
            agreement”.                                                                                


Page:  Previous  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011