J.J. Zand - Page 88

                                        - 170 -                                       

          hold that petitioner realized only one-third of the income.  The            
          balance of the Sunvaco termination payment ($381,600) and the               
          balance of the Diesel Power payments that were not attributable             
          to the P-3 aircraft should have been entirely reported as                   
          petitioner's income because he was the sole earner.                         
                                     B.  Ashland                                      
               Respondent asserts that during the 1973 taxable year Ashland           
          issued checks payable to petitioner in the amounts of $400,                 
          $5,000, $12,500 and $3,000.  However, the exhibit upon which                
          these allegations are based was admitted into evidence by the               
          Court's Order of October 9, 1992, only as a summary; hence, we              
          are not willing to use it as substantive evidence that such                 
          payments were made without any proof that the contents of this              
          exhibit are correct.  However, we note that the $5,000 payment              
          referred to in the summary was independently confirmed to be a              
          reimbursement in a letter accompanying the check from Ashland.              
          Therefore, that amount was not required to be included in                   
          petitioner's income.                                                        
               With regard to the 1973 payments from Ashland to Interrep,             
          one of the two documents drawing any link between petitioner and            
          Interrep was this same summary noted above.  For the same reason,           
          we are unwilling to use it as substantive evidence.  The only               
          other link between petitioner and Interrep is a letter from                 
          Ashland addressed to All Patents and affirmed by petitioner,                





Page:  Previous  160  161  162  163  164  165  166  167  168  169  170  171  172  173  174  175  176  177  178  179  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011