-53- Chorny could not recall whether petitioner lent him money during 1990 or 1991 nor could he recall whether he paid money to petitioner for any reason during 1990 or 1991. Petitioner's explanation at trial about the existence of loans is not credible. For example, petitioner stated that he gave to Chorny a $9,000 check on September 20, 1991, representing a short-term loan that Chorny paid back shortly thereafter. The $9,000 check that petitioners received from Chorny was dated September 2, 1991. Petitioners have not established by a preponderance of the evidence that the checks from Chorny represented loan repayments. Thus, respondent's determination that petitioners failed to report $20,472 and $9,250 in 1990 and 1991, respectively, as Schedule C income from real estate consulting activities will be sustained. 15 Hastings--Option Payment Respondent determined that petitioners failed to report on their 1991 return the $10,000 option fee that was received from the Woods. As part of the lease option agreement for 15 Hastings, petitioners received an option fee from the Woods in the amount of $10,000. This amount was deposited with Escrow Masters on November 3, 1989. The parties have agreed that the option fee was available at any time following the consummation of the option agreement. On December 1, 1989, petitioners withdrew thePage: Previous 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011