Beverly Gordon - Page 22

                                       - 22 -                                         
          Principal Residence) (Form 2119) that was included as part of               
          their 1986 return that they sold the Roslyn residence for                   
          $500,000, had a basis in it of $155,500, realized a gain of                 
          $344,500 from its sale, and planned to replace it within the                
          "replacement period".  Consequently, the Gordons did not include            
          any portion of that gain in the income that they reported in                
          their 1986 return.                                                          
               In a statement that was attached to their 1987 return, the             
          Gordons indicated that they had incurred a net operating loss for           
          1987 in an undisclosed amount and that, pursuant to section                 
          172(b)(3)(C), they were making an election to relinquish the                
          carryback of that loss.                                                     
               During August 1987, the IRS initiated an examination of the            
          Gordons' 1986 return.  Around 1988, a revenue agent met with B&S            
          and examined the Gordons' 1986 return and certain documents                 
          relating to that return that B&S had maintained.  He also re-               
          quested a meeting with Mr. Gordon in order to discuss his 1986              
          net trading loss.  Based on her conversations with Mr. Gordon,              
          Ms. Gordon was aware that the 1986 return was being examined by             
          the IRS.  On October 14, 1988, Mr. Gordon met with the IRS                  
          revenue agent who was examining the Gordons' 1986 return and                
          described to him the nature of his activities as an options                 
          market maker on the AMEX.  At the conclusion of that meeting,               
          that agent told Mr. Gordon that his 1986 net trading loss was               
          properly treated as an ordinary loss in the Gordons' 1986 return            




Page:  Previous  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011