United Cancer Council, Inc. - Page 16

                                       - 105 -                                        
          guaranteed to receive.  The $50,000 cap applied to any single               
          housefile mailing of more than 500,000.                                     
               5.  In almost all of Herge’s group of contracts the exempt             
          organization could terminate the fundraising contract with some             
          form of advance notice.  The longest notice so required is 120              
          days and the shortest is 30 days.  Often these contracts provide            
          that an exempt organization that terminates its fundraising                 
          contract becomes liable for mail campaign losses.  In contrast,             
          the Contract does not make any provision for petitioner to                  
          terminate it by giving notice or for cause.  On the contrary, the           
          Contract provides that, during its entire 5-year term, W&H would            
          be petitioner’s exclusive fundraiser, and specifically forbids              
          petitioner to “retain or use the services of any other person or            
          company to provide counsel or advice to [petitioner] in                     
          conducting its direct mail solicitations.”                                  
               Thus, W&H had an effective way to limit its risk if the                
          Contract did not prove to be productive--W&H could reduce or                
          eliminate the monthly draws that it allows petitioner to take and           
          it could end the advances used to fund future mailings for                  
          petitioner.  Once petitioner had grown accustomed to this                   
          lifeline, petitioner could not remain viable without continued              
          infusions; W&H could figuratively pull petitioner’s plug and                
          thereby effectively rid itself of future losses or insufficiently           
          profitable obligations.  Petitioner, on the other hand, had no              
          exit.  Presumably, petitioner could have refused to authorize               




Page:  Previous  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011