American Valmar International Ltd., Inc., et al. - Page 11

                                                - 11 -                                                   
            The envelopes in which the income tax returns of American Valmar                             
            for the fiscal years in issue were mailed to the Internal Revenue                            
            Service reflect the below-listed postmark dates:                                             
            Taxpayer            Period           Postmark Date                                           
            American Valmar         6/30/91             2/12/93                                          
            American Valmar         6/30/92             None                                             
            American Valmar         6/30/93            12/15/94                                          
                  American Valmar’s income tax returns for 1991, 1992, and                               
            1993, were received by the Internal Revenue Service on                                       
            February 16, 1993, July 6, 1994, and December 19, 1994,                                      
            respectively.                                                                                
                                                OPINION                                                  
            I.  Introduction                                                                             
                  The principal issues in this case involve the proper                                   
            characterization of various amounts received from abroad by wire                             
            transfer into bank accounts of petitioner American Valmar                                    
            International, Ltd., Inc. (American Valmar) and its principal                                
            shareholder, petitioner Valeri Markovski (Markovski).  Respondent                            
            disagrees with petitioners’ claim that the amounts received by                               
            American Valmar did not constitute items of gross income because                             
            of American Valmar’s obligation to expend those amounts on behalf                            
            of its clients.  Respondent also disagrees with petitioners’                                 
            claim that the amounts received by Markovski did not constitute                              
            items of gross income because those amounts were the proceeds of                             
            a hoard of rubles accumulated before Markovski emigrated to the                              
            United States.  Petitioners place substantial reliance on                                    




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011