-7-
The issue that I want to bring forth is the Federal
Reserve notes that circulate as dollars today are not
dollars, and I didn’t receive dollars. And I still stand
and believe that I had no duty to report to the Federal
Government my receipt or my expenditures of Federal Reserve
notes. Federal Reserve notes are not legal tender, * * *
Federal Reserve notes do not conform to the purported
guidelines of their issuance, * * *. The founding fathers
never intended for anything but dollars representing a
parity of gold or silver content in fineness and weight as
defined by the Coinage Act of 1792. [TR 30, lines 12-25; TR
31, lines 1-2]
At the end of the trial the Court described the role of
post-trial briefs, stressed the importance of proposed findings
of fact, and emphasized that each proposed finding of fact
“should state where in the record is the basis for this proposed
finding of fact.”
Petitioner’s proposed findings of fact, in their entirety,
are as follows:
PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR FINDING FACT [sic]
1. Throughout the year 1993, or any other year,
petitioner was not involuntarily obligated to file a federal
income tax return, returning a portion of the unredeemable
Federal Reserve notes to respondent and its issuer the
United States.
2. Because petitioner was not obligated to file this
return to the obligator in the first instance, fraudulent
penalties in denominational amounts of unredeemable Federal
Reserve notes should not be levied against the petitioner in
accordance with � 6673 or any other internal revenue law for
that matter.
Petitioner has been before this and other courts on income
tax matters on numerous occasions, as shown in table 1.
Table 1
Harrell I
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011