-17- As we have noted, petitioner relies primarily on his stated beliefs about Federal Reserve Notes; in the course of his testimony and his filings in the instant case he also adverts to various constitutional objections. Petitioner does not challenge the wisdom of the hundred-million-plus people who file tax returns, but contends that he is not obligated to file tax returns and will not do so. We do not believe that petitioner had a good-faith misunderstanding of the Internal Revenue Code or the Constitution. Petitioner was not bent on presenting a serious issue to the courts and cooperating with respondent in doing so. Compare Muste v. Commissioner, 35 T.C. 913, 920-921 (1961), with Habersham-Bey v. Commissioner, 78 T.C. at 313-314. Petitioner’s asserted confusions are not the sort that enable him to escape our verdict of fraud. Niedringhaus v. Commissioner, 99 T.C. 202, 216-220 (1992). We hold for respondent on this issue. II. Sec. 6673 We turn now, on our own motion, to the award of a penalty against petitioner under section 6673(a)7. 7 Sec. 6673 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: SEC. 6673. SANCTIONS AND COSTS AWARDED BY COURTS. (a) Tax Court Proceedings.-- (1) Procedures instituted primarily for delay, etc.--Whenever it appears to the Tax Court that-- (continued...)Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011