Gaylon L. Harrell - Page 8

                                         -8-                                          
          Harrell v. United States, No. ___ (C.D. Ill. Jan. 18, 1991)                 
          (dismissing petitioner's challenge to propriety of levy on wages;           
          described in Harrell II).                                                   

          Harrell II                                                                  
          Harrell v. United States, No. 91-3040, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS                
          6773, 1991 WL 631008 (C.D. Ill. Apr. 11, 1991) (dismissing suit             
          to quiet title to petitioner's wages:  "Although petitioner is              
          representing himself in this action, and pro se complaints must             
          be liberally construed, we caution Plaintiff that he is subject             
          to the mandate of Rule 11 [Fed.R.Civ.P.] and the potential for              
          sanctions should he file a third action in this Court.").                   

          Harrell III                                                                 
          Harrell v. United States, 4 F.3d 996 (table only), 1993 U.S. App.           
          LEXIS 22907, 1993 WL 339716 (text) (7th Cir. 1993) (after                   
          District Court granted summary judgment for Government in                   
          petitioner's suit for damages under sec. 7433 and imposition of             
          $500 penalty under sec. 6673, Court of Appeals affirmed and                 
          imposed additional $1,000 frivolous appeal penalty).                        

          Harrell IV                                                                  
          Harrell v. United States, 13 F.3d 232, 235 (7th Cir. 1993), affg.           
          Harrell II ("So the District Court was correct that it had no               
          jurisdiction over  the case--and for another reason:  Harrell's             
          challenge to the tax assessment is frivolous").                             

          Harrell V                                                                   
          Harrell v. United States, T.C. Memo. 1994-406, (after failing to            
          file tax returns for 1989 and 1990, petitioner contended that he            
          was citizen of the sovereign State of Illinois and that income he           
          received was not taxable by the United States; we sustained                 
          Commissioner's determination and imposed $3,000 penalty under               
          sec. 6673), affd. without published opinion 72 F.3d 132 (7th Cir.           
          1995).                                                                      

          Harrell VI                                                                  
          LaRue v. Collector of Internal Revenue, No. 95-3036, 1995 U.S.              
          Dist. LEXIS 8225, 1995 WL 479521 (C.D. Ill. June 21, 1995)                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011