Gaylon L. Harrell - Page 15

                                        -15-                                          
               Petitioner filed tax returns for about 20 years until 1979,            
          and then he stopped filing tax returns.  His failure to file tax            
          returns since then is intentional.                                          
               Petitioner’s most clearly stated explanation is that he was            
          paid in Federal Reserve Notes, which are not lawful money and               
          which are worthless.  Yet, petitioner used the supposedly                   
          worthless Federal Reserve Notes to pay his expenses.  We do not             
          believe petitioner really thought that the Federal Reserve Notes            
          were worthless.                                                             
               Petitioner worked for 24 years as a substitute rural carrier           
          for the USPS, and from 1992 onward as a full-time rural carrier.            
          Evidently, petitioner also had worked for another employer at               
          some time--during 1993 he received $15,720 in pension                       
          distributions.  We do not believe petitioner would have continued           
          for so long to exchange his labor or services for the right to              
          receive worthless paychecks or worthless currency.  Again, we do            
          not believe petitioner really thought that the Federal Reserve              
          Notes were worthless.                                                       
               Petitioner took the trouble to arrange a home-made money-              
          laundering operation, passing his paychecks through a bank                  
          account in the name of his son, and having his son write checks             
          to petitioner on this account.  Petitioner has not had a bank               
          account in his name since the mid-1980’s.  This is evidence that            
          petitioner was concerned with making it more difficult for                  
          respondent to locate his assets.                                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011