Martin Ice Cream Company - Page 38

                                                   - 38 -                                               
                  This Court and others have acknowledged this broader principle of                     
            what Court Holding and Cumberland Pub. Serv. stand for.19  Where                            
            shareholders are found to have negotiated the sale of corporate assets                      
            independently, on their own behalf, the form of the transaction is                          
            respected, and the corporation is not recast as the seller,                                 
            notwithstanding that some negotiations were carried on by the                               
            shareholders before the liquidation.  See, e.g., Bolker v.                                  
            Commissioner, 81 T.C. 782 (1983), affd. 760 F.2d 1039 (9th Cir. 1985);                      
            Doyle Hosiery Corp. v. Commissioner, 17 T.C. 641 (1951); Amos L. Beaty                      
            & Co. v. Commissioner, 14 T.C. 52 (1950).20  Where a corporation is                         
            found to have negotiated a transaction, and at the last minute, the                         
            shareholders are substituted for the corporation as sellers, Court                          
            Holding has been applied to regard the corporation as the seller for                        
            Federal income tax purposes.  See, e.g., Waltham Netoco Theatres, Inc.                      
            v. Commissioner, 401 F.2d 333 (1st Cir. 1968), affg. 49 T.C. 399, 405                       
            (1968); Kaufmann v. Commissioner, 175 F.2d 28 (3d Cir. 1949), affg. 11                      


                  19 The Supreme Court noted in Central Tablet Manufacturing                            
            Co. v. United States, 417 U.S. 673, 680 (1974), that its earlier                            
            decisions in Court Holding and United States v. Cumberland Pub.                             
            Serv. Co., 338 U.S. 451, 455 (1950), "created a situation where                             
            the tax consequences were dependent upon the resolution of often                            
            indistinct facts as to whether the negotiations leading to the                              
            sale had been conducted by the corporation or by the                                        
            shareholders."  See also Bolker v. Commissioner, 81 T.C. 782, 799                           
            (1983), affd. 760 F.2d 1039 (9th Cir. 1985).                                                
                  20 There is some discussion in the above-cited cases                                  
            concerning whether shareholders who are corporate officers or                               
            directors can negotiate a sale of assets in corporate solution                              
            on their own behalf, rather than on the corporation's behalf,                               
            especially when the negotiations take place before the                                      
            corporation resolves to liquidate the assets that are to be sold.                           




Page:  Previous  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011