Baine P. and Mildred C. Kerr - Page 34




                                       - 34 -                                         
          a  willing seller  for limited partnership interests in KFLP and            
          KILP.                                                                       
          III. Section 2704(b)--Applicable Restriction                                
               Petitioners contend that section 2704(b) is not applicable in          
          this case even if the Court concludes (as we have) that petitioners         
          transferred limited partnership interests to the GRAT’s and to              
          their children.  Petitioners argue that the provisions of section           
          10.01 of the partnership agreements do not constitute “applicable           
          restrictions” because: (1) The provisions do not restrict                   
          liquidation of the partnerships within the meaning of section               
          2704(b)(2)(A); and (2)  the university's interests in KFLP and KILP         
          demonstrate that the Kerr family did not have the ability                   
          unilaterally to lift any restrictions on liquidation within the             
          meaning of section 2704(b)(2)(B)(ii).  In the alternative,                  
          petitioners assert that any restrictions on liquidation in the              
          partnership agreements are excepted from the definition of an               
          “applicable restriction” pursuant to section 2704(b)(3)(B) and              
          section 25.2704-2(b), Gift Tax Regs.  Because we agree with                 
          petitioners' contention that restrictions on liquidation in the             
          partnership agreements are excepted from the definition of an               
          “applicable restriction” pursuant to section 2704(b)(3)(B) and              
          section 25.2704-2(b), Gift Tax Regs., we need not consider                  
          petitioners' remaining arguments.                                           








Page:  Previous  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011