May T. Rakow - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         

                    Risk-free rate                               7.1                  
               +    Equity risk premium                          7.4                  
               =    Average market return                        14.5                 
               +    Risk premium for size                        5.1                  
               +    Other risk factors                           5.0                  
               =    Net cash-flow discount rate                  24.6                 
               +    Net earnings discount-net cash-flow discount  0.0                 
               =    Net earnings discount rate                   24.6                 
               -    Average growth rate                          5.0                  
               =    Net earnings cap rate for next year          19.6                 
               /    1 + growth rate                              1.05                 
               =    Net earnings cap rate for current year       18.7                 
          Petitioner’s expert started with the risk-free rate of return for           
          the long-term Treasury bond on September 30, 1991.  He consulted            
          Ibbotson Associates 1992 Stocks, Bonds, Bills and Inflation                 
          Yearbook, to obtain the historical equity risk premium for stocks           
          and the premium for small company stocks.  He determined an                 
          additional premium of 5 percent was warranted when comparing IHC            
          to the public companies.  Petitioner’s expert considered IHC’s              
          net income and cash-flow to be the same because its capital                 
          expenditures approximated depreciation.  He assumed a growth rate           
          of 5 percent.  Petitioner’s expert converted the after-tax                  
          capitalization rate of 18.7 percent to 31.2 pretax, using a 40-             
          percent tax rate.  He then concluded that the buildup approach              
          yields a pretax earnings multiple of 3.2.                                   
               Petitioner’s expert then stated that, in FMI’s experience              
          with actual transactions involving privately owned construction             
          companies, the pretax P/E ratios ranged from 3 to 5.  No data on            
          these transactions appear in his report or elsewhere in the                 






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011