United Parcel Service of America - Page 15




                                       - 104 -                                        

          considerations.  NUF had prepared a binder for the Shippers                 
          Interest contract to become effective as of August 8, 1983.  On             
          the same day the contract was to become effective, Mr. Corde sent           
          a telex to Mr. Smetana indicating that petitioner postponed the             
          finalization of the Shippers Interest program to allow for                  
          petitioner's review and evaluation of pending tax legislation.              
          In April 1984, after restructuring its EVC activities, petitioner           
          released a report to shareholders in which petitioner indicated             
          that because OPL was organized as a Bermuda corporation doing no            
          business in the United States, OPL's earnings were not expected             
          to be subject to U.S. Federal or State taxes on income.                     
               The contemporaneous documentation prepared by petitioner and           
          Hall regarding the plan to restructure the excess value activity            
          emphasized the resulting tax benefits to petitioner.  Petitioner            
          produced no documentation, such as corporate minutes, that was              
          prepared during the period in which petitioner was considering or           
          executing its EVC restructuring that indicates that petitioner              
          had motives other than tax reduction.                                       
               Petitioner has failed to prove that the restructuring of its           
          EVC activity was motivated by nontax business reasons or that the           
          restructuring had economic substance.  Rather, we find that the             
          restructuring was done for the purpose of avoiding taxes and that           
          the arrangement between petitioner, NUF, and OPL had no economic            







Page:  Previous  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011