David H. and Suzanne Hillman - Page 19




                                       - 19 -                                         
          self-charged items are not specifically mentioned in the statute,           
          we have little difficulty placing self-charged items within the             
          ambit of section 469(l)(1) and (2).  Through the legislative                
          commentary, the Secretary was directed to issue regulations for             
          self-charged lending transactions.  The Secretary, by following             
          that direction and issuing section 1.469-7, Proposed Income Tax             
          Regs., 56 Fed. Reg. 14034 (Apr. 5, 1991), acknowledges that the             
          mandate of section 469(l)(2) includes self-charged items.  Under            
          those circumstances, it is more difficult to accept respondent’s            
          position that the Secretary’s failure to issue regulations is a             
          bar to a taxpayer’s claiming that nonlending self-charged                   
          transactions may also be offset.  Respondent’s position would               
          ring more true, but not necessarily more correct, if no                     
          regulations at all regarding self-charged items had been issued.            
               Having decided that the absence of regulations here is not             
          an acceptable basis for respondent’s determination, we turn to              
          the provision in question to determine whether petitioners are              
          entitled to self-charged treatment for the management fee income            
          and deductions.  Petitioner received nonpassive income, through             
          SMC, for SMC’s providing real estate management services for the            
          partnerships (in which petitioner had an ownership interest,                
          either directly or indirectly).  In connection with these real              
          estate management services, petitioner was also entitled to a               
          deduction for his distributive share of the management fees                 






Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011