Douglas P. McLaulin, Jr. et al. - Page 7




                                                - 7 -                                                  
                        WHEREAS, if corporation continues to wholly own                                
                  Sunbelt subsequent to the redemption, Sunbelt and                                    
                  Corporation will be prohibited from electing or                                      
                  maintaining their respective Subchapter S status for                                 
                  Federal tax purposes and for purposes of the income tax                              
                  imposed by the State of Florida * * *                                                
            Funding the Redemption                                                                     
                  Sunbelt needed cash in the amount of $828,243.74 to fund the                         
            redemption.  Although Sunbelt had assets and accumulated earnings                          
            in excess of that amount, it did not have the necessary cash.  On                          
            January 14, 1993, the amount available to Sunbelt pursuant to the                          
            1989 note was increased from $2 million to $3 million, and, on                             
            that same date, Sunbelt took advantage of its increased borrowing                          
            power under the 1989 note and borrowed $900,000 from Ridge,                                
            which, in part, it used to make the redemption.                                            
                                               OPINION                                                 
            I.  Introduction                                                                           
                  The fundamental question we must answer is whether gain                              
            is to be recognized to Ridge on account of the distribution.                               
            If so, then, since, for Ridge’s taxable year ending July 25,                               
            1993, it was an S corporation, petitioners must take into account                          
            their pro rata shares of such gain.  See sec. 1366(a).  No gain                            
            will be recognized to Ridge on account of the distribution if                              
            that transaction qualifies for nonrecognition treatment pursuant                           
            to section 355.  The pertinent provisions of section 355(a) and                            









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011