Carol M. Read, et al. - Page 32




                                       - 32 -                                         
               In arguing that only satisfaction of the primary-and-                  
          unconditional-obligation standard as to Mr. Read may satisfy the            
          on-behalf-of standard in Q&A-9, petitioners seem to be suggesting           
          that that temporary regulation requires only that there be a                
          transfer of property on behalf of the nontransferring spouse                
          (here Mr. Read), regardless who is making the transfer of prop-             
          erty and to whom such property is transferred.  Petitioners thus            
          reverse the on-behalf-of standard in Q&A-9 to read as follows:  A           
          transfer of property by a third party to the transferring spouse            
          on behalf of the nontransferring spouse.21  However, Q&A-9 does             
          not read that way and does not address such a transfer.  Q&A-9              

               20(...continued)                                                       
          Q&A-9 and sec. 1041 are satisfied).  In the case of a corporate             
          redemption in a divorce setting, Q&A-9 and sec. 1041 do not                 
          address the tax consequences to the nontransferring spouse whose            
          stock is not being redeemed, although Q&A-9 makes it clear that             
          if that temporary regulation applies, the nontransferring spouse            
          is deemed to have immediately transferred to a third party, in a            
          transaction that does not qualify for nonrecognition treatment              
          under sec. 1041, the property that such spouse is deemed to have            
          received from the transferring spouse.  However, neither Q&A-9              
          nor sec. 1041 prescribes the tax consequences to the nontransfer-           
          ring spouse as a result of that deemed transfer.  Instead, that             
          tax treatment is determined by other provisions of the Internal             
          Revenue Code.                                                               
               21The inquiry under constructive-dividend decisional law as            
          to whether a transfer of redemption proceeds by the redeeming               
          corporation to the redeeming stockholder satisfies a primary and            
          unconditional obligation of another stockholder is intended to              
          determine whether such a transfer, in substance, is (1) a payment           
          by the redeeming corporation of a dividend to the stockholder               
          whose stock is not being redeemed in an amount equal to such                
          redemption proceeds and (2) an immediate transfer of that same              
          amount by such stockholder to the stockholder whose stock is                
          being redeemed in payment for such stock.                                   





Page:  Previous  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011