Carol M. Read, et al. - Page 71




                                       - 71 -                                         
               If the buyer purchased all of the seller’s stock and                   
               later recouped some of the cash outlay by causing the                  
               corporation to redeem part of the newly acquired stock,                
               the redemption distribution would be a dividend to the                 
               extent of earnings and profits because, as a pro rata                  
               distribution, it could not meet the standards of                       
               ��302(b)(1), (2), or (3).  The buyer, however, avoids                  
               dividend consequences where the redemption is from the                 
               seller unless the buyer makes the mistake of undertak-                 
               ing a personal obligation to purchase the shares before                
               the corporation agrees to redeem them.                                 
          3 Bittker & Lokken, Federal Taxation of Income, Estates, & Gifts,           
          par. 93.1.5, at 93-17 (2d ed. 1991).                                        
               Although the form of the acquisition may be tailored to suit           
          the buyer’s tax status (a corporate buyer may prefer the dividend           
          treatment that, given sufficient earnings and profits, generally            
          would accompany the redemption of shares purchased from the                 
          seller), once it is tailored, the buyer is stuck with the chosen            
          form.  In an early leading case, Wall v. United States, 164 F.2d            
          462 (4th Cir. 1947), the taxpayer contracted to purchase stock              
          from a co-shareholder, agreeing to make a cash downpayment and to           
          deliver his notes for the remainder of the purchase price.  The             
          taxpayer made the downpayment and received the stock, which he              
          transferred to two trustees, to be held by them as security for             
          the notes.  After paying the first note, he transferred his                 
          equity in the stock to the corporation and caused it to pay the             
          remaining notes as they became due.  The Court of Appeals for the           
          Fourth Circuit had no difficulty in finding that the taxpayer’s             
          transfer of his equity to the corporation in consideration of the           






Page:  Previous  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011