Estate of Albert Strangi - Page 47




                                       - 47 -                                         
               In Estate of Montgomery v. Commissioner, 56 T.C. 489 (1971),           
          affd. 458 F.2d 616 (5th Cir. 1972), an elderly decedent, who was            
          otherwise uninsurable, purchased a single premium annuity and was           
          thereby able to obtain life insurance that he assigned to trusts.           
          The Court held that the arrangement was not life insurance within           
          the meaning of the parenthetical exception contained in section             
          2039, and therefore, the proceeds of the policies were includable           
          in decedent’s gross estate.  In so holding, the Court used the              
          language of step transactions to find that the annuity and                  
          insurance were part of a single investment agreement.                       
               Daniels v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1994-591, applied the              
          step-transaction doctrine in a gift tax case in favor of the                
          taxpayers to conclude that an outright gift of common stock to              
          children and a simultaneous exchange of some common for preferred           
          were parts of the same gift.  As a result, the Commissioner’s               
          belated attempt to tax the imbalance in values on the common-               
          preferred exchange was barred by the statute of limitations.                
               My conclusion that the property to be valued for estate tax            
          purposes should be the property transferred to SFLP is further              
          supported by the decision of Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v.                   
          Commissioner, 839 F.2d 1249 (7th Cir. 1988), affg. Northern Trust           
          Co. v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 349 (1986).  There, the Court of               
          Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the taxable value of a            
          gift is not altered by the terms of the conveyance; therefore,              






Page:  Previous  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011