- 29 - compensation. Owensby & Kritikos, Inc. v. Commissioner, 819 F.2d 1315, 1325-1326 (5th Cir. 1987), affg. T.C. Memo. 1985-267. However, no particular ratio between compensation and gross or net taxable income is a prerequisite for a finding of reasonableness. Id. at 1326. Over the period January 1, 1987, through July 31, 1996, petitioner had the annual gross receipts and net income (before taxes and officer compensation)19 set forth below. FYE July 31 Gross Receipts Net Income 1987 $423,987 $58,299 1988 856,623 141,745 1989 742,876 104,705 1990 978,152 158,100 1991 1,407,191 251,012 1992 2,053,999 233,852 1993 3,247,464 689,195 1994 3,289,189 1,192,457 1995 3,638,980 778,656 1996 4,561,878 1,051,896 From January 1, 1987 through July 31, 1996, the annual compensation paid Mr. and Mrs. Myers represented the percentages of petitioner’s gross income and net income (before taxes and officer compensation) set forth below: 19The net income figure given for the fiscal year ended July 31, 1996, is net of the $92,681 that petitioner contributed to the qualified retirement plan it established for petitioner’s employees that year. No breakdown is available as to the portion of the $92,681 contribution that would benefit Mr. and Mrs. Myers as opposed to petitioner’s other employees. The record does reflect that Mr. and Mrs. Myers were among the employees who would benefit under the plan. It is thus likely that most, if not substantially all, of the contribution would benefit them.Page: Previous 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011