B & D Foundations, Inc. - Page 30




                                        - 30 -                                        
                         Total Officer    Percentage of     Percentage of             
          FYE July 31    Compensation      Gross Income       Net Income              
          1987           $36,750             8.67             63.04                   
          1988      67,450             7.87             47.59                         
          1989            58,050             7.81             55.44                   
          1990           112,650            11.52             71.25                   
          1991           186,100             13.22          74.14                     
          1992           230,000             11.20          98.35                     
          1993           613,785             18.90          89.05                     
          1994           902,500             27.44          75.68                     
          1995           702,500             19.30          90.22                     
          1996         1,113,800             24.42          105.88                    
               For the 1996 fiscal year in issue, petitioner had a net loss           
          after taxes of $61,904 as a result of the $586,500 salary and               
          $163,000 bonus paid to Mr. Myers and the $288,500 salary and                
          $75,800 bonus paid to Mrs. Myers.  These payments equaled 105.88            
          percent of petitioner’s net income for that year (before taxes              
          and officer compensation).  Petitioner that year also experienced           
          a $155,901 reduction in its equity ($534,443 net assets and                 
          equity at the beginning of the year, less $378,542 net assets and           
          equity at yearend, without regard to the obligation petitioner              
          took on in that year to pay an additional $488,000 of “deferred             
          compensation” to Mr. and Mrs. Myers).                                       
               Respondent’s expert acknowledged that Mr. and Mrs. Myers               
          were undercompensated during petitioner’s early years of                    
          operation.  However, as discussed more fully infra pp. 43-47,               
          respondent and petitioner disagree over whether Mr. Myers and               
          Mrs. Myers remained underpaid for their past services in prior              








Page:  Previous  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011