Wayne and Pamela Berry - Page 27




                                       - 27 -                                         
          invested, should have alerted petitioners to the need for further           
          investigation of the partnership transactions.  Their reliance on           
          Clothier was misplaced because Clothier knew little about the               
          business aspects of Whitman, and there is no reason for us to               
          think he misled petitioners about the extent of his own knowledge           
          in this respect.  Clothier relied on conclusory statements of               
          insiders as well as the conclusion of his client, an engineer,              
          who had no expertise in either taxes or the plastics recycling              
          industry and made only a casual inquiry about the transaction.              
          Neither Clothier nor petitioners undertook a good faith                     
          investigation of the fair market value of the recyclers or the              
          underlying economic viability or financial structure of Whitman.            
          Accordingly, we hold that petitioners are liable for the                    
          additions to tax for negligence under section 6653(a) for 1979              
          and section 6653(a)(1) and (2) for 1982 and 1984.                           
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              
                                                  Decision will be entered            
                                             under Rule 155.                          

















Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  

Last modified: May 25, 2011