- 142 - further stated during his testimony, Mr. Mogul appraised the condominium units as property to be held by a single investor, or "entrepreneur". Finally, Mr. Dalton, who appraised the 40 units of the Reflections, testified at trial that his "assignment [from respondent] was, how much should EPIC have paid for this property." In the memorandum attached to their appraisal, Messrs. Dalton and Ramos make the following statement: The fair market value of the properties acquired by Epic Associates 84-III is based on the market place in which they were acquired, the wholesale market. As such, the fair market value is the price paid by Epic Associates 84-III to the seller, without regard to any RDC (rental deficit contribution) or other supposed Builder Rebate. They do not explain why the fair market value of the properties acquired by EA 84-III must be determined in "the market place in which they were acquired, the wholesale market" when, as they also recognize, EA 84-III purchased the properties for resale and received special discounts in the purchase price from the sellers. The report of respondent's principal expert witness, Dr. Richard Hewitt III, does not explicitly discuss the appropriate market for determining the value of the subject properties. Dr. Hewitt's report does suggest that thePage: Previous 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011