- 33 - Once again, petitioners have presented no persuasive evidence on this issue, and the record does not otherwise establish that their failure to file timely returns was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect. In this regard, we find unpersuasive petitioners’ claim that they should be relieved of the addition to tax because their new accountant for 1997 was unable to timely receive information from the former accountant as to the basis of certain stock that they sold. We see no reason why the return was not filed timely. We sustain respondent’s determination under section 6651(a). All arguments made by petitioners but not discussed herein have been considered and have been found to be without merit. Accordingly, Decision will be entered under Rule 155.Page: Previous 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
Last modified: May 25, 2011