Edward A. Robinson III and Diana R. Robinson - Page 18




                                       - 107 -                                         
          policy grounds3.  Two articles agree with the Courts of Appeals’             
          reversals on the statutory interpretation.4  The balance of the              
          articles comment on the issue and the controversy but appear to              
          take no position one way or the other.5                                      
               One commentator stated:                                                 
               Temp. Reg. 1.163-9T(b)(2)(i)(A) should be invalidated if it             
               is inconsistent with other statutes and regulations.  It                
               appears to be in conflict with Temp. Reg. 1.163-                        
               8T(c)(3)(ii), which was also enacted after the Blue Book                
               explanation was published.  This regulation controls when no            
               loan proceeds are received as follows:                                  
                         If a taxpayer incurs or assumes a debt in                     
                    consideration for the sale or use of property, for                 
                    services, or for any other purposes, or takes                      
                    property subject to a debt, and no debt proceeds                   
                    are disbursed to the taxpayers, the debt is                        
                    treated for purposes of this section as if the                     
                    taxpayer used an amount of the debt proceeds equal                 


               2(...continued)                                                         
          Treasury Goes Too Far”, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 557, 579-581                  
          (2001); Reynolds, Comment, “Redlark v. Commissioner:  A ‘Bird in             
          the Hand’ for Noncorporate Taxpayers?”, 47 Case W. Res. L. Rev.              
          751, 795 (1997).                                                             
               3  Engel, “Deducting Interest on Federal Income Tax                     
          Underpayments:  A Roadmap Through a 50-Year Quagmire”, 16 Va. Tax            
          Rev. 237, 296-297 (1996).                                                    
               4  Harllee, 536-2nd Tax Mgmt. (BNA), “Interest Expense                  
          Deductions”, at A-113 (1998); Popkin, “The Taxpayers’ Third                  
          Personality:  Comments on Redlark v. Commissioner”, 72 Ind. L.J.             
          41, 61 (1996).                                                               
               5  7 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, sec. 26:35, at            
          93 (2001); Banoff et al., “After Allen, Is There Substantial                 
          Authority for Deducting Interest on Tax Deficiencies?”, 90 J.                
          Taxn. 377 (1999); Banoff et al., “Two More Courts Reject Redlark             
          – Interest on Taxes Not Deductible”, 91 J. Taxn. 255 (1999);                 
          Raby, “Deducting Interest on a Form 1040 Deficiency”, 67 Tax                 
          Notes 945, 946 (1995); “Interest on Taxes Never Deductible, Ninth            
          Circuit Says – Redlark Reversed”, 88 J. Taxn. 260 (1998).                    




Page:  Previous  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  115  116  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011