Square D Company and Subsidiaries - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         
          were members of the same controlled group of corporations as                
          defined in section 267(b)(3) and (f).                                       
               During the years in issue, petitioner was a bona fide                  
          resident of the United States, and the Schneider Lenders were               
          bona fide residents of France, within the meaning of Article                
          3(1a) and (2a) of the Convention With Respect to Taxes on Income            
          and Property, July 28, 1967, U.S.-Fr., 19 U.S.T. 5281 (1967                 
          Treaty).  During the years in issue, neither the Schneider                  
          Lenders nor SNC maintained a permanent establishment in the                 
          United States within the meaning of the 1967 Treaty.                        
               Article 10(1) of the 1967 Treaty would have applied to any             
          payments by petitioner of the accrued interest on the 1991 and              
          1992 Subordinated Loans that occurred before January 1, 1996.  As           
          a result, the payments would have been exempt from taxes that               
          otherwise would have been due under sections 881 and 1442.                  
               Petitioner did not claim deductions for the interest accrued           
          but unpaid with respect to the 1991 and 1992 Subordinated Loans             
          on its returns for taxable years 1991 and 1992.  During the                 
          course of the examination by respondent, petitioner informally              
          requested that it be allowed to deduct the amounts of interest              
          accrued in 1991 and 1992; namely, $21,075,101 and $38,541,695,              
          respectively.  In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined           
          petitioner was not entitled to the deductions.                              








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011