- 71 - Thus, we hold, for petitioner, that all of the amounts petitioner paid to Jack that would not exceed reasonable compensation for Jack’s services were in fact paid as compensation for Jack’s services. To take account of the foregoing, Decision will be entered under Rule 155.Page: Previous 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71
Last modified: May 25, 2011