Michael T. Hawkins and Janine M. Hansen - Page 2

                                       - 2 -                                          
                                     Background                                       
               Petitioners failed to file Federal income tax returns for              
          1997, 1998, and 1999.  On May 25, 2001, respondent issued to each           
          petitioner a notice of deficiency for those years.  Relying on              
          Forms W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, and Forms 1099 information,              
          respondent determined deficiencies in petitioners’ Federal income           
          taxes as follows:                                                           
                                   Michael T. Hawkins                                 
          Year        Deficiency        Sec. 6651(a)(1)        Sec. 6654(a)           
          1997         $8,291.00           $1,074.75$206.27                             
          1998           7,852.00            1,621.75  289.88                         
          1999      8,435.80       1,311.20       236.68                              
                                    Janine M. Hansen                                  
          Year        Deficiency        Sec. 6651(a)(1)        Sec. 6654(a)           
          1997         $1,255.00             $313.75--                                  
          1998             848.00       212.00              --                        
          1999      848.00         212.00                   --                        
          Petitioners resided in Sparks, Nevada, on August 23, 2001, when             
          they timely filed their petition.                                           
               On October 12, 2001, respondent filed an Answer.  On March             
          15, 2002, respondent then filed a Motion for Summary Judgment               
          (summary judgment motion).  On April 22, 2002, petitioners filed            
          a Response to Motion for Summary Judgment (response to summary              
          judgment motion) and a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction           
          (jurisdiction motion).  The Court heard the motions together, and           
          at the conclusion of the hearing respondent made an oral Motion             
          to Impose a Penalty under Section 6673 (penalty motion).  The               
          parties did not enter into a stipulation of facts.                          






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011