- 6 - that application of the burden is the least restrictive means of achieving a compelling governmental interest.3 See 42 U.S.C. sec. 2000bb-1(b); Adams v. Commissioner, supra. In evaluating whether the Government has met the compelling interest test, cases decided prior to Smith are applicable, and the test “should not be construed more stringently or more leniently than it was prior to Smith.” Adams v. Commissioner, supra at 139. 1. Substantial Burden To establish a violation under RFRA, a claimant must first show that the Government “substantially burdened” his or her free exercise of religion. 42 U.S.C. sec. 2000bb-1(a). A statute burdens the free exercise of religion if it “puts substantial pressure on an adherent to modify his behavior and to violate his beliefs”. Thomas v. Review Bd. of Ind. Employment Sec. Div., 450 U.S. 707, 718 (1981). A substantial burden must be more than an 3 In addition to the compelling interest test provided for by RFRA, petitioners rely on Miller v. Reed, 176 F.3d 1202, 1207 (9th Cir. 1999), to assert a hybrid-rights claim and apply a strict scrutiny analysis. In Employment Div. v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872, 881-882, (1990), the Supreme Court excepted a hybrid-rights claim from its rational basis analysis and thus recognized the applicability of the strict scrutiny analysis where a law “[involves] not the Free Exercise Clause alone, but the Free Exercise Clause in conjunction with other constitutional protections”. Petitioners’ argument for strict scrutiny analysis here amounts to a request for application of the compelling interest test set forth by RFRA. See, e.g., Hill v. Colorado, 530 U.S. 703, 748 (Scalia, J., dissenting)(2000), (referring to “that stringent mode of constitutional analysis our cases refer to as ‘strict scrutiny,’ which requires that the restriction be narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest.”); see also Kessler v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 1285, 1290 (1986), affd. 838 F.2d 1215 (6th Cir. 1988).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011