- 12 - merit. Third, it is well established that there is no constitutional right to a jury trial in a suit concerning Federal tax liability in the Tax Court. Dawn v. Commissioner, 675 F.2d 1077, 1079 (9th Cir. 1982), affg. T.C. Memo. 1979-479; Rowlee v. Commissioner, supra; Cupp v. Commissioner, 65 T.C. at 86 (“where a taxpayer takes advantage of the procedure of filing a petition in the Tax Court without payment of the tax, any deprivation of a jury trial is due to his own act”). For the foregoing reasons, petitioners’ jurisdiction motion will be denied. II. Summary Judgment Motion Summary judgment is intended to expedite litigation and avoid unnecessary and expensive trials. Pope & Talbot, Inc., & Subs. v. Commissioner, 104 T.C. 574, 575 (1995). Rule 121(a) provides that either party may move with or without supporting affidavits, for summary judgment upon all or any part of the legal issues in controversy. Under Rule 121(b) decision shall thereafter be rendered “if the pleadings, answers to interrogatories, depositions, admissions, and any other acceptable materials, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that a decision may be rendered as a matter of law." See O'Neal v. 6(...continued) violation of the statute. The Tax Court clearly has jurisdiction to hear an RFRA challenge. See, e.g., Adams v. Commissioner, 110 T.C. 137, 138 (1998), affd. 170 F.3d 173 (3d Cir. 1999).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011