Walter L. Medlin - Page 67

                                       - 151 -                                        
          Allen.  On Schedule C of petitioner’s 1986 tax return, he                   
          deducted the costs of his subscriptions to Playboy and Penthouse            
          magazines.96  Petitioner also claimed as deductible expenses on             
          his Schedules C:  (1) Subscription payments for Sesame Street and           
          Dr. Seuss books; and (2) travel and entertainment expenses for              
          credit card payments to Burdines, Neiman Marcus, Jordan Marsh,              
          Master Card, and Visa; and (3) expenses for gasoline and expenses           
          related to his 25 Ferrari automobiles.  These items are                     
          inherently personal in nature, and petitioner’s claiming those              
          deductions pursuant to his method of preparing his returns for              
          1985 through 1988 is evidence of fraud.                                     
               Petitioner also points to certain expenses which he claims             
          are related to his orange grove, cattle, and Ferrari collection             
          activities.  He claims that respondent disallowed all expenses              
          relating to those activities, which he claimed on his returns.              
          Petitioner contends that, although it might be appropriate to               
          disallow expense deductions for those activities when determining           
          his deficiencies, fraud penalties should not be imposed on the              
          tax liabilities resulting from their disallowance.  However, it             


               96Petitioner argues on brief that the Playboy magazine                 
          “could be used by Mr. Medlin as reading material for his real               
          estate business”, and although he concedes those are not                    
          allowable expenses, he suggests that such deductions are not                
          indicative of fraud.  We disagree.  Those items are inherently              
          personal and are items which we find someone in petitioner’s                
          position as a real estate businessman would have known were not             
          deductible.  In our view, claiming those deductions on a return             
          shows a willingness to evade tax.                                           




Page:  Previous  141  142  143  144  145  146  147  148  149  150  151  152  153  154  155  156  157  158  159  160  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011