- 92 -
A Oh. Okay. She could probably tell you better
than I could.
Q But that kind of a mistake would have been
corrected through the transfer that we see on there?
A That’s correct.
Q And that’s your memory of it now?
A I don’t have any memory of it. Just looking at
that and knowing the cast of characters, I think that’s
what happened.
Mike Partin, who was personally involved with the Sybil
Partin/Michael Bast transaction, also testified that petitioner
had no ownership interest in the property sold to Mr. Bast, that
Sybil Partin was the owner of the property, and that Mr. Bast was
the purchaser.
Although petitioner did not question Ms. Goodman regarding
the deposit entry and the purported correction, Ms. Goodman was
questioned generally about the ledger system she maintained. She
testified that the ledger system did not involve actual physical
transfers but was “simply a bookkeeping trace”. Ms. Goodman
testified that when a transfer was made to another ledger card,
“I would write, Moved, on the card that it came from, and I would
write either Received or Transferred from the card that it came
from.”
On the basis of the testimony offered at trial, we are
satisfied that petitioner did not have an ownership or other
interest in the property sold by Sybil Partin to Michael Bast and
Page: Previous 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011