- 15 - separate maintenance were deductible by the payor. Installment payments discharging the obligation to pay a principal sum generally were not periodic payments and thus were not deductible by the payor. An exception existed where installment payments were deemed periodic payments if the payments either (1) lasted or might have lasted more than 10 years from the date of the divorce decree, or (2) were contingent upon the death of either party, the payee’s remarriage, or a change in the economic status of either party.9 In the cases respondent relies on, taxpayers attempted to qualify for the exceptions under prior law by arguing that installment payments and periodic payments were part of an overall plan for support and were to be viewed as a single stream of payments. These cases involved attempts by taxpayers to “camouflage” installment payments by means of combining them with periodic payments. Bernstein v. Commissioner, supra at 445. The payment provisions in the cases under prior law contained contradictory terms or lacked any indication that they were intended to be read in conjunction with each other. These factual scenarios are readily distinguishable from the instant situation. Current law does not involve the issue of whether payments are periodic or installment payments, and petitioner is 9See Yoakum v. Commissioner, 82 T.C. 128, 136 (1984); former sec. 71(c)(1); former sec. 1.71-1(d)(3)(i) and (ii), Income Tax Regs.Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011