Delaware Corp., et al. - Page 36

                                       - 36 -                                         
          related penalty under section 6662(a).                                      
                                       OPINION                                        
               Each petitioner bears the burden of proving that respon-               
          dent’s determinations in the notice that respondent issued to               
          such petitioner is erroneous.  See Rule 142(a); Welch v.                    
          Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933).                                        
               We must determine whether:  (1) Delaware Corporation’s                 
          payments during 1994 of the 1994 Caroline County farm expenses              
          and the 1994 Virginia Beach property expenses and during 1995 of            
          the 1995 Virginia Beach property expenses (collectively, the                
          disputed property expenses) constitute constructive dividends to            
          Ms. Havens for those respective years that Delaware Corporation             
          is not entitled to deduct; (2) Delaware Corporation is entitled             
          for 1994 to the 1994 Virginia Beach property depreciation deduc-            
          tion and for 1995 to the 1995 Virginia Beach property deprecia-             
          tion deduction (collectively, the Virginia Beach property depre-            
          ciation deductions); (3) Delaware Corporation’s payments during             
          1994 of the legal fees with respect to the Mitchums Creek prop-             
          erty constitute constructive dividends to Mr. Barber for that               
          year that Delaware Corporation is not entitled to deduct;                   
          (4) Delaware Corporation’s payments during 1994 of the 1994 child           
          care expenses and during 1995 of the 1995 child care expenses               
          (collectively, the disputed child care expenses) constitute                 
          constructive dividends to Mr. Barber for those respective years             






Page:  Previous  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011