Delaware Corp., et al. - Page 39

                                       - 39 -                                         
               sham without effect for Federal income tax purposes.                   
               * * *                                                                  
               Respondent counters:                                                   
               A fundamental principle of income tax law is that                      
               economic substance prevails over form, and in this case                
               the real estate transactions between petitioners were                  
               without economic substance because petitioner Havens                   
               remained the true owner of the equity in the proper-                   
               ties. * * *                                                            
                  *       *       *       *       *       *       *                   
               It is abundantly clear that the real estate transac-                   
               tions between Havens and Delaware Corporation are                      
               without economic substance.  Havens always remained in                 
               possession of the properties and controlled the proper-                
               ties as she had done before the transfers.  Once the                   
               Court looks through the alleged transfer to Delaware                   
               Corporation, no economic relationships were altered,                   
               and Havens remained the owner of the Virginia Beach and                
               Caroline County properties.                                            
               On the record before us, we reject petitioners’ argument               
          that as of August 1, 1993, or any time thereafter during the                
          years in question, Ms. Havens transferred the Caroline County               
          farm and the Virginia Beach property to Delaware Corporation and            
          that Delaware Corporation became the owner of those properties.             
          On that record, we agree with respondent that during the years in           
          question Ms. Havens remained the owner of both of those proper-             
          ties.                                                                       
               In determining whether the benefits and burdens of ownership           
          of the Caroline County farm and of the Virginia Beach property              
          passed from Ms. Havens to Delaware Corporation, we look to Keith            
          v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 605 (2000), for guidance.  In Keith v.            






Page:  Previous  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011